Abrams, J. et Hall, P., 2006. Else/Where: Mapping — New Cartographies of Networks and Territories 1st ed., Univ. Minnesota Design Institute.
Albert, M., Hurrelmann, K., et Quenzel, G., 2010. 16. Shell Jugendstudie. Jugend 2010. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
Baur, R., 2005. Das Gesetz und seine visuellen Folgen / La loi et ses conséquences visuelles, Lars Müller Publishers.
Bechmann G, Stehr N., 2002. The legacy of Niklas Luhmann. Society. Volume: 39, Issue: 2, Pages: 67-75.
Becker, Sven. Regierung scheitert am Bürgerdialog. Spiegel Online., 2011 [online] Available at: <http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,783532,00.html> [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Behavioural economics: seven principles for policy-makers, 2005. (Nef: new economics foundation) [online] Available at: <http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/behavioural-economics> [Accessed 22 September 2011].
Benkler, Y., 2007. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yale University Press.
Bennett, W.L., 2008. Civic life online: learning how digital media can engage youth, MIT Press.
Bennett, W Lance, 2007. Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. World.
—., 2006. “Digital Natives as self-actualizing natives.” Digital Media, no. 1996.
—. , 1998. “The UnCivic Culture: Communication , Identity, and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics.” Political Science 31, no. 4: 740-761.
Bennett, W. Lance, Chris Wells, and Allison Rank., 2009. “Young citizens and civic learning: two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age.” Citizenship Studies 13, no. 2.
Boekraad, H., 2008. My work is not my work: Pierre Bernard: design for the public domain, Lars Müller Publishers.
—. , 1997. Norm and form: on the role of graphic design in the public domain. In: Bierut, M., et al., 1997. Looking closer 2: Critical writings on graphic design. New York: Allworth Press.
Bonsiepe, Gui., 2010. Design and democracy. Civic City, Cahier 2. Bedford Press.
Boyd, Danah , 2008a. “Taken Out of Context. American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics”. PhD Dissertation. University of California-Berkeley, School of Information.
—. 2008b. „Can Social Network Sites Enable Political Action?“ In Allison Fine, Micah Sifry, Andrew Rasiej and Josh Levy (Eds.) Rebooting America. Creative Commons. 112-116.
—., 2002. “Faceted Id/entity: Managing Representation in a Digital World”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Master’s Thesis. August 9, 2002.
—. 2010. „Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.“ In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (ed. Zizi Papacharissi), pp. 39-58.
—., 2007. “Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life.” MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume (ed. David Buckingham). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 119-142.
Brandes, U. et Erlhoff, M., 2006. Non intentional design, Daab.
Brandes, U., Stich, S. et Wender, M., 2008. Design by Use: The Everyday Metamorphosis of Things, Birkhäuser.
Brown, T., 2009. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, HarperCollins.
Bruseberg A and McDonagh-Philp D, 2000. “User-Centred Design Research Methods: The Designer’s Perspective.” In: Childs P R N and Brodhurst E (eds.) Integrating Design Education Beyond 2000 Conference, University of Sussex, September 4-6, pp 179-184.
Bryman, A., 2004. Social Research Methods 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, USA.
Buckingham, D., 2008. Youth, identity, and digital media, MIT Press.
Buegerhaushalte in Deutschland. Available at: <http://www.buergerhaushalt.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Vierter-Statusbericht-Buergerhaushalt.de-April-2011.pdf> [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Burd, L., 2007. “Technological initiatives for social empowerment: design experiments in technology-supported youth participation and local civic engagement”. Program in Media Arts and Sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. PhD: 226 leaves.
Card, S.K., Mackinlay, J.D. et Shneiderman, B., 1999. Readings in information visualization, Morgan Kaufmann.
Carpini, Michael X. Delli., 2001. “Gen.com: Youth, Civic Engagement, and the New Information Environment, Working Paper, http://www.jsisartsci.washington.edu/programs/cwesuw/carpini.htm (8 Aug. 2001).
—. , 2004a. Fay Lomax Cook, and Lawrence R. Jacobs. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 07, no. 1 (May 2004): 315-344.
—. , 2004b. The Youth Engagement Initiative Strategy Paper, 10, In Montgomery, Kathryn, et al. Youth as E-Citizens : Engaging the Digital Generation Youth as E-Citizens, March (2004).
Clean up nyc. Available at: <http://www.cleanupnyc.org/about.html> [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Cloonan, Martin., 1998. “Rock The Vote: popular culture and politics.” Politics 18, no. 1 (February 1998): 33-38.
Coleman, S., 2004. Touching the State, magazine of Design Council UK, [online] Available at: < http://www.designcouncil.info/mt/RED/touchingthestate/TouchingTheState.pdf> [Accessed 27 September 2011]
—. , 2008. “Doing IT for Themselves: Management versus Autonomy in Youth E-Citizenship.“ Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Edited by W. Lance Bennett. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 189–206
Cottam, Hilary, and Henrietta Moore., 2004. “Touching the State.” Public Policy Research, no. 272099.
Couldry, Nick, and Tim Markham., 2006. “Public connection through media consumption: between oversocialization and desocialization”, london school of economics and political science. Political Science: 1-34.
Cremades, J., 2007. Micropoder, Espasa.
Cross, N., 2007. Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer.
Dahlgren, Peter., 2000. “The Internet and the Democratization of Civic Culture.” Political Communication 17, no. 4 (October 2000): 335-340.
Dewey, J. as cited by Greene,R, 2003. „John Dewey‘s eloquent citizen: communication, judgment, and postmodern capitalism“. Argumentation and Advocacy [online] Available at: <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6699/is_3_39/ai_n28989364/> [Accessed 28 September 2011]
Dovi, Suzanne. “Political Representation”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Available at: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/political-representation/>.
Emmer, Martin/Vowe, Gerhard/Wolling, Jens, 2009. (Re-)Conceptualizing Citizenship – How the Internet Changes Political Communication and Participation. Mediated Citizenship. Political Information and Participation in Europe, 18.09.2009, Leeds, UK
Fry, T., 2011. Design as Politics, Berg Publishers.
Fuchs, Dieter., 2003. “Models of Democracy : Participatory , Liberal and Electronic Democracy”, Prepared for Presentation at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Edinburgh, U.K., 28th March – 2nd April 2003. Workshop 22: “Bringing Citizens Back in – Participatory Democracy and Political Participation”.
Gaver, B., Dunne, T. & Pacenti, E., 1999. Cultural Probes. Interactions, (1 & 2), 21-29.
Gaver, William W., et al., 2004. “Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty.” Interactions 11, no. 5 (September 1, 2004): 53.
Goodwin, K. et Cooper, A., 2009. Designing for the Digital Age: How to Create Human-Centered Products and Services, John Wiley et Sons.
Gormley, Ivo, 2009. UsNow. [video online] Available at: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlqU1o3NmSw> [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Habermas, J., 1991. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, MIT Press.
Heidegger, M. Contributions to Philosophy, 1999, p.76, as cited by Fry, T., 2011.
Heller, S. et Vienne, V., 2003. Citizen designer: perspectives on design responsibility, Allworth Communications, Inc.
Hindman, M.S., 2009. The myth of digital democracy, Princeton University Press.
Howland, Lydia., 2002. Logged off. Demos.
Jenkins, H. et Thorburn, D., 2004. Democracy and new media, MIT Press.
Johnson, S., 2001. Emergence, Scribner.
Karlsson, M. Interactivity as a strategy for political representation – A conceptual discussion and empirical illustrations among political bloggers, Paper prepared for presentation at the IPSA/ECPR conference, february 2011)
Kennedy, Gabrielle, 2009. Interview with Daniel Van der Velden: “The Relationship Between Design and Populist Politics”, for design.nl. Available at <http://www.design.nl/item/the_relationship_between_design_and_populist_politics> [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Krishna, Anirudh., 2002. “Enhancing Political Participation in Democracies. What is the Role of Social Capital?”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 35 No. 4, May 2002. p.438
Lathrop, D. et Ruma, L., 2010. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice, O‘Reilly Media, Inc.
Lavin, M., 2002. Clean New World: Culture, Politics, and Graphic Design, MIT Press.
Levine, Peter., 2008. “A Public Voice for Youth: The Audience Problem in Digital Media and Civic Education.“ Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Edited by W. Lance Bennett. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 119–138.
Longford, G., 2005. Pedagogies of Digital Citizenship and the Politics of Code, Techn´e 9, no. 1 (2005):68, as cited by Coleman, 2008.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. Political theory in the welfare state. Walter de Gruyter.
—. 1995. Social systems. Stanford University Press.
Luke, R., 2002. Habit@online: Web Portals as Purchasing Ideology, Topia: A Canadian Journal of CulturalStudies 8 (fall 2002): 61–89, as cited by Coleman, 2008.
Maciel,L. Liedke, L. Rodrigues, R., We all want to be young. [video online] Available at <http://vimeo.com/16638983?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+slacking+(Slacking+online) [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Mattelmäki, Tuuli et Battarbee, Katja., 2002. “Empathy Probes”, In proceedings of PDC2002 , Malmö 23-25.6.2002
—., 2006. Design Probes. University of Art and Design Helsinki.
McCloud, S., 1994. Understanding Comics. Kitchen Sink Press. 1994, as cited by Sanders, 2000.
Micheletti, Michele and Dietlind Stolle, 2005. “Concept of Political Consumerism,” in Youth Activism—An International Encyclopedia. Lonnie R. Sherrod (ed.), Westport: Greenwood Publishing.
Montgomery, Kathryn, et al, 2004. Youth as E-Citizens : Engaging the Digital Generation Youth as E-Citizens, no. March (2004).
Montgomery, Kathryn C., 2008. “Youth and Digital Democracy: Intersections of Practice, Policy, and the Marketplace.” Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Edited by W. Lance Bennett. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press., p.26
Noveck, B.S., 2009. Wiki government: how technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful, Brookings Institution Press.
Only Dreaming, 2010. Farewell, Dynamic Democracy. [blog] 1 July, Available at: < http://onlydreaming.net/blog/farewell-dynamic-democracy> [Accessed 28 September 2011]
O‘Reilly, Tim., 2010. „Government as a Platform“, in Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice, Lathrop, D. et Ruma, L.. O‘Reilly Media, Inc.
Parker, S, Spires, P, Farook, F & Mean, M, 2008, State of trust: how to build better relationships between councils and the public, Demos, London.
Putnam, Robert., 1995. Bowling Alone: America‘s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy – Volume 6, Number 1, January 1995, pp. 65-78
RED Report. Available at <http://www.designcouncil.info/mt/RED/democracy/>, [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Rheingold, Howard., 2008. “Using Participatory Media and Public Voice to Encourage Civic Engagement.“ Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Edited by W. Lance Bennett. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 97–118.
Robinson,D. Yu, H. Zeller,W. Felten, EW., 2009. Government Data and the Invisible Hand. 11 YJOLT | Yale Journal of Law & Technology.. & Tech. 160 [online] <http://www.yjolt.org/files/robinson-11-YJOLT-.pdf > [Accessed August 3, 2011].
Root-Bernstein, R. and Museo , M., 1999, Sparks of Genius: The 13 Thinking Tools of the World‘s Most Creative People (Houghton-Mifflin, New York)., In Sanders, 2001.
Rousseau, J. et Cranston, M., 1968b. The social contract, Penguin Classics.
Sanders, Elizabeth B., 2008. “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design.” CoDesign 4, no. 1 (March 2008): 5-18.
—., 2002. “From User-Centered to Participatory Design Approaches”, In Design and the Social Sciences. J.Frascara (Ed.), Taylor et Francis Books Limited.
—., 2000. “Generative tools for co-designing”. In S. A. R. Scrivener, L. J. Ball, & A. Woodcock (Eds.), Proceedings of CoDesigning 2000 Conference (pp. 3-12). London: Springer-Verlag.
—., 2010. Stepping Stones across the gap. Explorations in the generative design space. In Halse, J., Brandt, E., Clark, B. and Binder, T. (Eds.) Rehearsing the Future, The Danish Design School Press, 2010.
Sanders, Elizabeth B, and Colin T William., 2001. “Harnessing People’ s Creativity : Ideation and Expression through Visual Communication.” In Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development. Langford J and McDonagh-Philp D (Eds.) Taylor and Francis.
Sanders, L., Simons, George. The Cluetrain Manifesto., 2009. “Value Co-Creation A Social Vision for Value Co-creation in Design.” Open Source Business Resource, December 2009: 1-5.
Schlesinger, J., 2010. Votes, Photos, and Book Recommendations: How Politicians Use Facebook. Abc News [online] Available at: <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/politicians-facebook-photos-videos-votes-reach-constituents/story?id=12358070> [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Schuler, D., Namioka, A., 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Schulz, W., 2005. “Political Efficacy and Expected Participation among Lower and Upper Secondary Students”. A comparative analysis with data from the IEA Civic Education Study. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference in Budapest 8-10 September.
Seidl, D., 2004. “Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic social systems”. Munich Business Research No. 2004-2.
Sørensen, Kirsten Bonde. Interview In Mind Design, n.25, 2010. Available at: <http://www.dcdr.dk/uk/Menu/Update/Webzine/Articles/Using+Creativity+to+Enhance+Consumer+Awareness> [Accessed 28 September 2011]
Stappers, P.J., and Sanders, L., 2003. Generative tools for contextmapping: tuning the tools. Third International Conference on Design & Emotion, Loughborough, Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2007. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
Surowiecki, J., 2004. The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations, Doubleday.
Turnšek, M., 2007. “The digital youth revolt? Young people and eParticipation”. In: Understanding eParticipation – Contemporary PhD eParticipation research in Europe, ed. by Anders Avdic and Karin Hedström and Jeremy Rose and Ake Grönlund, chap. 13, pp. 201-216, Örebro University Library.
Verba, S, Schlozman KL, Brady HE. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Democracy. Harvard University Press.
Verba, Sidney., 2001. Political Equality. What is it? Why do we want it?. Harvard University. Russell Sage Foundation Working Paper Series.
Sleeswijk Visser, F., 2009. Bringing the everyday life of people into design. Doctoral thesis TU Delft.
Sleeswijk Visser, F. et al., 2005. “Contextmapping: experiences from practice.” CoDesign 1, no. 2 (April 1, 2005): 119-149. doi:10.1080/15710880500135987.
Thornhill, C. 2000. Political theory in modern Germany: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Winhall, Jennie. “Is design political?”, Core 77, [blog], Available at <http://www.core77.com/reactor/03.06_winhall.asp> [Accessed 27 September 2011]
Wright, S. Street, J., 2007. Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums. New Media Society 2007; 9; 849.
Wyeth, Peta, and Carla Diercke., 2006. “Designing cultural probes for children.” Proceedings of the 20th conference of the computer-human interaction special interest group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-human interaction: design: activities, artifacts and environments – OZCHI ’06.
